2000 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1966 Ford Cortina
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Suburban | 1966 Ford Cortina | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Suburban | Cortina |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 9 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 68 L |