2000 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1967 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,327 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban (282 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1674 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Suburban | 1967 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
| Model | Suburban | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5327 cc | 745 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2334 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 33 L |
