2000 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Suburban. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Suburban would be higher. At 8,100 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban (335 HP) has 268 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Suburban has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Suburban will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Suburban | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Suburban | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8100 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 9 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2490 mm |