2000 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 2009 Ford Flex
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Suburban. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Suburban would be higher. At 5,327 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban (282 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2009 Ford Flex. (256 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Flex.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Flex. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban (441 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Flex. (245 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Flex.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Suburban | 2009 Ford Flex | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Suburban | Flex |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5327 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 256 HP |
Torque | 441 Nm | 245 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 9 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1930 mm |