2000 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Suburban. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Suburban would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 912 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban (502 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Suburban | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
| Model | Suburban | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 502 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2390 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 47 L |
