2000 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1951 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe (283 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1951 Triumph Renown. (67 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1951 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1008 kg more than 1951 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe (481 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1951 Triumph Renown | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Tahoe | Renown |
Year Released | 2000 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5964 cc | 2088 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 283 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 481 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2292 kg | 1284 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2750 mm |