2000 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1966 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe (261 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1828 kg more than 1966 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1966 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | Tahoe | Seven |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4807 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2260 kg | 432 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2240 mm |