2000 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe (283 HP) has 209 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1412 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe (481 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 365 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 323. (116 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Tahoe | 323 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5964 cc | 1490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 283 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 481 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 77.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2292 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2370 mm |