2000 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1982 Audi 4000
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 5,327 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe (269 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1982 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 4000.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe (450 Nm) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 4000. 1982 Audi 4000 has automatic transmission and 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe has manual transmission. 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Audi 4000 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1982 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Audi |
Model | Tahoe | 4000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5327 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 137 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2550 mm |