2000 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 972 kg more than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Tahoe | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5964 cc | 2259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 283 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2292 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2680 mm |