2000 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112
To start off, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe would be higher. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe (283 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (110 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe (481 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (151 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 has automatic transmission and 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe has manual transmission. 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
Model | Tahoe | Ultimate 112 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Horse Power | 283 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 481 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1570 mm |