2000 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe (261 HP) has 182 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe (393 Nm) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Tahoe | Micra |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4807 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 393 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2449 mm |