2000 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe would be higher. At 5,327 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 66 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe. (269 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 450 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles. 2012 Audi RS3 has automatic transmission and 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe has manual transmission. 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Audi RS3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Audi |
Model | Tahoe | RS3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5327 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 450 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed automated manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |