2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1952 Saab 92
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1952 Saab 92 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Saab |
| Model | Tracker | 92 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2480 mm |
