2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1955 Pontiac Star Chief
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Pontiac Star Chief. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Pontiac Star Chief would be higher. At 4,715 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Pontiac Star Chief is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Pontiac Star Chief (173 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Pontiac Star Chief should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1955 Pontiac Star Chief | |
Make | Chevrolet | Pontiac |
Model | Tracker | Star Chief |
Year Released | 2000 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 4715 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3110 mm |