2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1956 Citroen 11
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 1,909 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Citroen 11 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1956 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen 11.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Citroen 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1956 Citroen 11 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Tracker | 11 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1909 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3280 mm |