2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1957 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1957 Isuzu Minx. (45 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1957 Isuzu Minx.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Isuzu Minx. (91 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1957 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Chevrolet | Isuzu |
Model | Tracker | Minx |
Year Released | 2000 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 91 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2440 mm |