2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1959 DAF 600
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1959 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1959 DAF 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DAF 600. (45 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1959 DAF 600 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
| Model | Tracker | 600 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 45 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2060 mm |
