2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1963 Steyr 500D
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Steyr 500D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Steyr 500D would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1963 Steyr 500D. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1963 Steyr 500D.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Steyr 500D. (32 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Steyr 500D.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1963 Steyr 500D | |
Make | Chevrolet | Steyr |
Model | Tracker | 500D |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 2970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1330 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 1850 mm |