2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1965 Steyr 700C
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1965 Steyr 700C. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1965 Steyr 700C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Steyr 700C. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Steyr 700C.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1965 Steyr 700C | |
Make | Chevrolet | Steyr |
Model | Tracker | 700C |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 643 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 20 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1330 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 1950 mm |