2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1967 MG 1100
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1967 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1967 MG 1100.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 MG 1100. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1967 MG 1100 | |
Make | Chevrolet | MG |
Model | Tracker | 1100 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2380 mm |