2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1968 Mazda 1000
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1968 Mazda 1000. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda 1000. (77 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda 1000.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1968 Mazda 1000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Tracker | 1000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 77 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2270 mm |