2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,446 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2000 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Tracker | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2000 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 7446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2960 mm |