2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1970 Jaguar Type E
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Jaguar Type E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Jaguar Type E would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Jaguar Type E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Jaguar Type E (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Jaguar Type E should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1970 Jaguar Type E | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Tracker | Type E |
Year Released | 2000 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 4235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1190 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2450 mm |