2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1973 Citroen SM

To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Citroen SM (171 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.

Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Citroen SM (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1973 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chevrolet Tracker 1973 Citroen SM
Make Chevrolet Citroen
Model Tracker SM
Year Released 2000 1973
Body Type SUV Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 2670 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 97 HP 171 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 237 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Length 4140 mm 4900 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1690 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2960 mm