2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1973 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1973 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1973 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Tracker | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2700 mm |
