2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1974 Lada 1300
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lada 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lada 1300 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1974 Lada 1300 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lada |
Model | Tracker | 1300 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2430 mm |