2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1976 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1976 Rolls-Royce Corniche has automatic transmission and 2000 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1976 Rolls-Royce Corniche will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1976 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Tracker | Corniche |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3030 mm |
