2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1977 Subaru Rex
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Subaru Rex. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Subaru Rex would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1977 Subaru Rex. (29 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1977 Subaru Rex.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Subaru Rex. (42 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Subaru Rex.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1977 Subaru Rex | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Subaru |
| Model | Tracker | Rex |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 544 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 29 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 42 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 1930 mm |
