2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1984 Mercedes-Benz 300
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (5 cylinders), 1984 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Mercedes-Benz 300 (125 HP) has 28 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Mercedes-Benz 300 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Mercedes-Benz 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Mercedes-Benz 300 (245 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 1984 Mercedes-Benz 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1984 Mercedes-Benz 300 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Tracker | 300 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 125 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 245 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2800 mm |