2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1985 Renault 25
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Renault 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Renault 25 would be higher. At 2,456 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Renault 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Renault 25 (205 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Renault 25 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Renault 25, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Renault 25. (72 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Renault 25.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1985 Renault 25 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Tracker | 25 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2456 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 205 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 72 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2730 mm |