2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1993 Renault Safrane

To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Safrane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Safrane would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Renault Safrane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Renault Safrane (106 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Renault Safrane should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.

Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Renault Safrane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Renault Safrane (155 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1993 Renault Safrane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chevrolet Tracker 1993 Renault Safrane
Make Chevrolet Renault
Model Tracker Safrane
Year Released 2000 1993
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 1995 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 97 HP 106 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 155 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4140 mm 4740 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1690 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2770 mm