2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1994 Renault Clio

To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1994 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1994 Renault Clio.

Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Renault Clio. (85 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chevrolet Tracker 1994 Renault Clio
Make Chevrolet Renault
Model Tracker Clio
Year Released 2000 1994
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 1171 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 97 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 85 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4140 mm 3710 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1690 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2550 mm