2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1996 Italdesign Formula 4
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Italdesign Formula 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 (147 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Italdesign Formula 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 (187 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Italdesign |
| Model | Tracker | Formula 4 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1998 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 147 HP |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 187 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2550 mm |
