2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser would be higher. At 1,600 cc, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser (115 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser (153 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Plymouth |
| Model | Tracker | Pronto Cruiser |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1600 cc |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 115 HP |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 153 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2650 mm |
