2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2001 Suzuki Baleno

To start off, 2001 Suzuki Baleno is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki Baleno. (85 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki Baleno.

Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki Baleno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki Baleno. (103 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki Baleno.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chevrolet Tracker 2001 Suzuki Baleno
Make Chevrolet Suzuki
Model Tracker Baleno
Year Released 2000 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 1298 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 97 HP 85 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 103 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4140 mm 4350 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1690 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2490 mm