2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2003 Renault Be Bop
To start off, 2003 Renault Be Bop is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Be Bop is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Be Bop (221 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Be Bop should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2003 Renault Be Bop is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Be Bop will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Be Bop (300 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2003 Renault Be Bop will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 2003 Renault Be Bop | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
| Model | Tracker | Be Bop |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 221 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2610 mm |
