2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2004 GMC Safari
To start off, 2004 GMC Safari is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Safari (191 HP) has 94 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 2004 GMC Safari | |
| Make | Chevrolet | GMC |
| Model | Tracker | Safari |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 4294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 191 HP |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2830 mm |
