2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2004 Honda Integra
To start off, 2004 Honda Integra is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Honda Integra (217 HP) has 120 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 2004 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
| Model | Tracker | Integra |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 217 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4374 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1725 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2350 mm |
