2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2004 Isuzu Axiom
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Axiom is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Axiom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (250 HP) has 153 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2004 Isuzu Axiom is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (334 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Axiom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 2004 Isuzu Axiom | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Isuzu |
| Model | Tracker | Axiom |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 3491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 250 HP |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 334 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2710 mm |
