2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2004 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2004 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln Navigator (301 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2004 Lincoln Navigator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln Navigator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln Navigator (481 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 2004 Lincoln Navigator | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lincoln |
Model | Tracker | Navigator |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 481 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3070 mm |