2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2004 Mercury Monterey
To start off, 2004 Mercury Monterey is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Monterey is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Monterey (201 HP) has 104 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Monterey should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Monterey, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Monterey (357 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Monterey will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 2004 Mercury Monterey | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | Tracker | Monterey |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 201 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 357 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3070 mm |