2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (330 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Dodge |
| Model | Tracker | Ram |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 5621 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 330 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 509 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2440 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3580 mm |
