2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Tracker | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 434 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2830 mm |