2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2005 Volkswagen Jetta

To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Jetta is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Volkswagen Jetta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Jetta (180 HP @ 4150 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Jetta should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.

Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Jetta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volkswagen Jetta (240 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2005 Volkswagen Jetta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chevrolet Tracker 2005 Volkswagen Jetta
Make Chevrolet Volkswagen
Model Tracker Jetta
Year Released 2000 2005
Body Type SUV Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 1786 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 5 valves
Horse Power 97 HP 180 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4150 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 240 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4140 mm 4420 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1690 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2520 mm