2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2006 GMC Savana
To start off, 2006 GMC Savana is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 5,963 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Savana (300 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Savana (488 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 349 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 2006 GMC Savana | |
Make | Chevrolet | GMC |
Model | Tracker | Savana |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 5963 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 488 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 12 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 6210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 2090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3940 mm |