2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2008 Tata Indica
To start off, 2008 Tata Indica is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Tata Indica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Tata Indica. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Tata Indica.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 2008 Tata Indica | |
Make | Chevrolet | Tata |
Model | Tracker | Indica |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2410 mm |