2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2011 Peugeot 508
To start off, 2011 Peugeot 508 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Peugeot 508 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Peugeot 508 (161 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot 508 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot 508, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 2011 Peugeot 508 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Peugeot |
Model | Tracker | 508 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 161 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4792 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1853 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2817 mm |