2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2012 Fiat Freemont
To start off, 2012 Fiat Freemont is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Fiat Freemont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Fiat Freemont (168 HP) has 71 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Freemont should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Freemont, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Fiat Freemont has automatic transmission and 2000 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Fiat Freemont will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 2012 Fiat Freemont | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Tracker | Freemont |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 168 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4887 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1834 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2891 mm |