2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2012 Opel Astra

To start off, 2012 Opel Astra is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2012 Opel Astra. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2012 Opel Astra.

Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Opel Astra. (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Opel Astra.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chevrolet Tracker 2012 Opel Astra
Make Chevrolet Opel
Model Tracker Astra
Year Released 2000 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 1384 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 97 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 125 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4140 mm 4260 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 2040 mm
Vehicle Height 1690 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2620 mm